Angle App

Hello, after a while participating in the testnet, I have some feedback as follows: The first is the interface, very compact and easy to use, especially for newbies. I am very impressed with the conversion speed. Very fast and smooth. This is what I really like In the "Staking" section, more should be put as a percentage of the value and "Max" of the whole value. That will be more convenient for those who want to quickly put the amount as a percentage (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, etc.) or the full amount they have. It will save a lot of time instead of sitting and calculating 30%, 70% of how much money I have and then write down a specific number. Anyway my testnet experience is pretty good. Here are some suggestions for the team to refer to soon to make the project more complete. Hopefully the project will thrive in the near future. Congratulations team My address : 0x55A1438b4b666c4359909aC902C41be09C3b821a

Hi team Angle Protocol, Thank you for your hard work on the project. The idea of using stablecoins for exchange and profit while maintaining price stability in Angle is very good (especially other stablecoins currently have less advantage than stablecoins using USD). User interface is simple, friendly, clear, and easy to use. I love it. The experience is very smooth, but you still need to improve the transaction speed a lot, the time pending is still quite long (15-20s). Hopefully when going to mainnet the speed will be better. Something went wrong with a transaction, but I can't solve it. It's been 2 days, but it still shows pending here, can you add one more step so that I can manipulate this order to cancel. When I first started, I did not understand the mechanism of action, so the Perpetuals section for Open Position had many difficulties when I could not add any pairs at all. However, it's ok after that, I see a lot users getting this error, I think Angle should give more clear instructions for this part. Because users do not understand where they did wrong. Finally, I don't know how to get Angle asset to show up in my wallet? My address wallet: 0xec6FF00b2D6B7f60F1431aaf192cB883F1b414F7 My contact info: Discord: phonghoa#3574 Twitter: @PhongHoa96

The color scheme is acceptable, you can add tooltips and menu language selection.

I wish angle can add chiness luangue in dapp. beceacuse some of users use automatic translation function to reload web, some times there were some bugs and un-adoption problems

On mobile, the menu panel needs to automatically retract when the user selects a feature instead of the user having to manually close it.

I think the speed of testing needs to be optimized now, and the pages need to be more intuitive and easy for people to use。The interface looks very nice and the work is enjoyable. In the futures section, I propose to focus on leverage. Highlight leverage with a brighter color.

responsive bug on mobile when I click to open wallet details box

The overall interface has too many lines and looks messy, because the LOGO is linear, I suggest to weaken it on the background image

Hello Team, After spending quite a while experiencing your project, here are some of my review: Beautiful UI, smooth, fast and easy to use. The site layout is great and looks basic but easy on the eyes. Everything is clear and full for users to follow their transactions. All transactions are add in the block. It makes me feel secure and trust when conducting transaction. I didn't find any bugs during my experience. Teams have taken the user's feedback and improved Angle day by day. I see the team's investment and meticulousness. My experience today is much better than yesterday, everything is ready for mainnet. I will continue to monitor and support the project in the future. Contact me if you need any other support. My contact: Discord: Thien Binh#1279 My Wallet Address: 0x72abC87f194dE4bF7579e8206A979dA27e80991B

With the Mint feature, I found that after completing a Mint command, the web will automatically clear the token pair I selected earlier. I think the UX design here has a good that users won't mistakenly execute double commands. However, if I look at it from a different perspective, I am a user who tends to test a small amount command first to see if the protocol or network is ok at that time? If the small amount test is successful I will do the rest, so if I clear this token pair as it is, it will cost the user a lot of time to choose the token pair again. I think it would be better to keep the pair token option after successful execution but clear amount to avoid the user doing it twice.